Tag Archives: Sanger sequencing

Sanger Sequencing Analysis – pCR2.1/RLOv Clones

Sequencing results from the samples that were submitted to Genewiz on Friday have come back:

  • SW01    RLOv_DNA_Helicase-M13F_-21_
  • SW02    RLOv_head_to_tail-M13F_-21_
  • SW03    RLOv_membrane_gene_1-M13F_-21_
  • SW04    RLOv_membrane_gene_2-M13F_-21_
  • SW05    RLOv_tail_fiber-M13F_-21_
  • SW06    RLOv_DNA_Helicase-M13R
  • SW07    RLOv_head_to_tail-M13R
  • SW08    RLOv_membrane_gene_1-M13R
  • SW09    RLOv_membrane_gene_2-M13R
  • SW10    RLOv_tail_fiber-M13R

The data (10-313205054_ab1.zip) has been stored in the following location: backupordie/sequencing_data/Sanger.

Sequences were loaded into Geneious (v.9.0.2). Vector sequences were trimmed/annotated using the Trim Ends with UniVec feature in Geneious.

Each clone was sequenced once from each direction, so the two sequences generated from each clone were mapped to the original sequence from which the primers were designed using Geneious Mapper.

The Geneious analysis was exported and saved in the following location:

backupordie/Sam/Sequencing_Analysis/Sanger/20151026_RLOv_clones_Sanger_analysis.geneious

Results:

Each clone’s sequence matches that of the source sequence, so we’re good to go!

Will proceed with dye-based quantification of each plasmid. Will then proceed with developing ISH probes (membrane genes 1 & 2, tail fiber gene) or qPCR standard curves (DNA helicase, head-to-tail).

In the alignments below, the reference sequence is highlighted in light yellow. The two electropherograms are align below the reference. The grey line in the consensus sequence indicates any sequence disagreements by placement of a black mark at the position. However, the sequences all match, so there are no black marks in the regions between the identified vector sequences (red annotations below each electropherogram).

Share

Sanger Sequencing Submission – pCR2.1/RLOv Clones

Submitted the pCR2.1/RLOv clones from earlier this week for Sanger sequencing to Genewiz (order #10-313205054).

Submitted ~500ng of each plasmid in a final volume of 15μL (including primer). Each clone will be sequenced from each direction with M13F (-21) (25pmol; 2.5μL of 10μM stock) and M13R primers (25pmol; 2.5μL of 10μM stock) for a total of 10 sequencing reactions:

  • SW01    RLOv_DNA_Helicase-M13F_-21_
  • SW02    RLOv_head_to_tail-M13F_-21_
  • SW03    RLOv_membrane_gene_1-M13F_-21_
  • SW04    RLOv_membrane_gene_2-M13F_-21_
  • SW05    RLOv_tail_fiber-M13F_-21_
  • SW06    RLOv_DNA_Helicase-M13R
  • SW07    RLOv_head_to_tail-M13R
  • SW08    RLOv_membrane_gene_1-M13R
  • SW09    RLOv_membrane_gene_2-M13R
  • SW10    RLOv_tail_fiber-M13R
Share

Sample Submission – Olympia oyster & Sea Pen PCRs Sanger Sequencing

Prepared two DNA plates and corresponding primer plates for sequencing at the UW HTGC from the purified gel-purified PCRs from yesterday. Primer plates were prepared by adding 7μL of NanoPure H2O to each well and then adding 3μL of 10μM primer to the appropriate wells. For the DNA plates, added 10μL of DNA to the appropriate wells.

NOTE: The H2A_ST1 samples had insufficient volume of DNA for all four sequencing reactions. Added 30μL of NanoPure water to purified DNA, mixed and distributed to the appropriate wells.

Sequencing plates layouts can be seen here (Google Sheet): sequence_log.

Submitted the plates to the UW HTGC for Sanger sequencing.

Share

Sanger Sequencing Data – pCR2.1/Clam RLO clones

Received data from yesterday’s sequencing submission for GENEWIZ order: 10-291940235.  Clones from each of the three groups (16s, EHR, EUB) were sequenced (see below).

Raw sequencing data (.ab1) files were stored on: backupordie/Sequencing Data/Sanger/10-291940235_ab1.zip

  1. SW01 16s_C2_01-M13F(-21)
  2. SW02 16s_C2_02-M13R
  3. SW03 16s_C3_01-M13F(-21)
  4. SW04 16s_C3_02-M13R
  5. SW05 EHR_C2_01-M13F(-21)
  6. SW06 EHR_C2_02-M13R
  7. SW07 EHR_C3_01-M13F(-21)
  8. SW08 EHR_C3_02-M13R
  9. SW09 EUB_C2_01-M13F(-21)
  10. SW10 EUB_C2_02-M13R
  11. SW11 EUB_C3_01-M13F(-21)
  12. SW12 EUB_C3_02-M13R
Share

Sequencing – C.gigas COX2/PGS2 Clone #4 from 20110728

Used new primers for sequencing (SR IDs: 1351 & 1352) clone #4. Sequenced clone two times in each direction. DNA and primers were sent for sequencing at ASU. Requested “High GC” treatment to help overcome the issue seen on 20110728.

Results:

Sequencing results received 20110810. Initial analysis suggests that we managed to fully sequence this clone! Will try to assemble a full-length CDS for COX2/PGS2.

Share

Plasmid Isolation & Sequencing – C.gigas COX2/PGS2 Clones (from yesterday)

Isolated plasmid DNA from 3mL of liquid cultures that were inoculated yesterday using Qiagen’s miniprep kit. DNA was eluted with 50uL of EB. DNA was prepped and sent for sequencing to ASU sequencing facility. Each clone was sequenced two times in each direction. Samples are as follows:

Name – Clone # Primer

  • SJW01 – 1 M13F
  • SJW02 – 1 M13F
  • SJW03 – 1 M13R
  • SJW04 – 1 M13R
  • SJW05 – 2 M13F
  • SJW06 – 2 M13F
  • SJW07 – 2 M13R
  • SJW08 – 2 M13R
  • SJW09 – 3 M13F
  • SJW10 – 3 M13F
  • SJW11 – 3 M13R
  • SJW12 – 3 M13R
  • SJW13 – 4 M13F
  • SJW14 – 4 M13F
  • SJW15 – 4 M13R
  • SJW16 – 4 M13R

Clone #s are as follows:

1 – 5′ Library Top band

2 – 5′ Library Mid band

3 – 5′ Library Bottom band

4 – 3′ Library band

Results:

Sequencing results received 20110801. SJW15 and 16 apparently stop abruptly. The sequencing facility believes this to be caused by secondary structure of the template. Depending on how things align, I may consider using 7-daeza-GTP in a PCR reaction and re-sequencing this clone, as the 7-daeza-GTP helps relax secondary structure.

Spoke with Steven and he suggested just designing new primers closer to each other and resubmit.

Share

Sequencing – PGS Hi 4 (PGS2/COX2)

Sent plasmid prep to ASU (5uL of plasmid + 1uL of 10uM M13F/R). SJW01 = M13F, SJW02 = M13R.

Results:

Sequencing looks great! Definitely have a portion of the second isoform of COX/PGS!! Here’s the result of the consensus BLASTed in GenBank>Nucleotide (others)>blastn:

Top hit in the db is COX1/PGS1, and, clearly, there are differences between the two sequences confirming that we have the second isoform (COX2/PGS2). Will design more RACE primers in hopes of obtaining the full-length cDNA sequence.

Share